[EL Laskar, Coordinator of the OxHRF] At the launch of the Oxford Human Rights Festival in March, Dr Sana Murrani, Associate Professor (Spatial Practice) and Founder of the Displacement Studies Research Network at Plymouth University invited us to join a discourse around the limitations of resilience frameworks and assessments within the humanitarian sector. As we recognise and celebrate resilient systems are we failing to see their limitations? Dr Murrani writes ‘celebrating the positivity of the resilient isn’t by itself a powerful enough lens to delineate the transformations that people can achieve individually and collectively after the trauma of displacement.’
![]() |
Carey Marks, Creative Associate 2019, Mapping Creative Recovery |
Moving from resilience into thriving by Dr Sana Murrani
Rhetoric around climate disasters, wars and conflict, and economic deprivation has moved on from describing the vulnerable to celebrating the positivity of the resilient. The UN definition of resilience relates the concept to the particular capabilities of cities and communities to tackle chronic stresses (such as high unemployment, crime and violence rates etc) and acute shocks (whether natural or man-made) and that one size resilience doesn’t fit all.