Monday, 29 June 2020

COVID-19 and informal settlements


Photo: 1to1 Agency of Engagement, 2020
Chloe Loader writes:

The emergence of novel coronavirus COVID-19 has had huge social and economic impact, causing high excess mortality and significant economic decline. The pandemic has and is affecting different groups disproportionately, its effects amplified by existing challenges in housing. As humanitarians respond to the ongoing crisis, it is vital to understand and implement key aspects of the humanitarian development nexus to address long-term impacts. This blog post will focus on the risks being faced by those in informal settlements during the pandemic, predominantly considering those in South Africa. Inadequate housing is strongly linked to an increased vulnerability to disease due to overcrowding, poor ventilation, sanitation and lack of services This particularly impacts communities facing additional hazards such as flooding and fires, increasing the risk of transmission and chance of infection. The pandemic has highlighted the inequality experienced by these communities, with social distancing and self-isolation a privilege not accessible to all.

Key questions:

What are the increased risks for residents of informal settlements to infectious diseases, such as COVID-19?

How can design principles be implemented in informal settlements to allow for social distancing and/or safe hygienic practices?

How can humanitarian responses to COVID-19 incorporate development initiatives that prevent communities from facing long-term vulnerability to infectious diseases?

Existing literature on the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on residents of informal settlements is so far limited due to a lack of quantitative data. However, there are organisations such as 1to1 Agency of Engagement that are working on the ground directly with residents to engage communities with making masks and provide handwashing facilities and soap. There is however literature discussing the impacts of other infectious diseases, which will impact residents in similar ways.  Investigation of the impacts of COVID-19 on informal settlements is vital so that long-term management practices, spatial adaptations, attitude changes and increased availability of resources can be implemented for residents. With unreliable data available for many countries, particularly for informal settlements, it is difficult to establish the extent of the issue. Cases for low and middle income countries, such as Brazil, Peru and South Africa are currently rising, highlighting the increased risk to poorer communities.

My personal experience working in South Africa this year in January, not long before the first cases of COVID-19 were detected in the country, highlighted to me the risk of infection for people living in informal settlements. It is difficult to understand fully the conditions of a slum until you have experienced it. Overcrowding and lack of hygiene/access to facilities is a daily norm. In South Africa, residents have been fighting for their homes to be legalised, electricity and water to be installed and conditions to become safe. This is a long process, with many political and economic hurdles to overcome. On my return to the UK, the people I met in South Africa have been at the front of my mind as the pandemic has worsened, unable to comprehend the risk that these vulnerable communities now face. While COVID-19 has caused suffering for so many globally, the impact of livelihood/education/living conditions of many in developed countries is minimal in comparison to the most vulnerable communities.

Monday, 22 June 2020

Voices from OxHRF: ‘Bits of Borno’ - life in the midst of crisis

Celebrations - Party from Bits of Borno (Photo (c) Fati Abubakar)
Elizabeth Laskar writes: There has been a gruelling conflict between the military and non-state armed groups in the north eastern regions of Nigeria for over 10 years. It has resulted in serious human rights violations and the desperate need for humanitarian assistance for the populations trapped in the middle. In the states of Borno, Adamawa and Yobe approximately 14,400 people have been killed, 53 percent of the total population of 13.4 million need humanitarian assistance, 1.3 million people have been internally displaced and 38% suffer daily from food insecurity. Terror, violence and conflict continue to plague these states. 
The terror group Boko Haram (meaning ‘western education is forbidden’) claims the state of Borno as their stronghold and continues to commit acts of terror in the region and neighbouring states of Chad and Niger who have been enveloped into the crisis. Between 2013 and 2015 the group killed more than 11,000 people and today the UN reports that 2.4 million people have been displaced in Nigeria and in the neighbouring countries. Unicef reports that over 1000 children have been abducted since 2013 by the group which includes the kidnapping of over 200 girls from a school in Chibok in 2014. 100 girls are still missing. A narrative of terror continues to be reported through news and media and stories of strength and resilience of the IDPs are often overlooked.
‘Bits of Borno’ is a project that chronicles the everyday lives of individuals and communities in the state of Borno. The project was instigated by Fati Abubakar, a celebrated Nigerian documentary photographer, photojournalist, and public health worker from the capital of Borno, Maiduguri. 
Through her photography, Fati wants people to bear witness to a different perspective of her hometown and she also aims to strengthen a narrative of hope within the IDP communities themselves. She feels her work counters the violent extremist message of Boko Haram - her passion is about creating counter-narratives for the underrepresented communities. 
‘Bits of Borno’ is a collection of unique stories that share the lives of the internally displaced through photographs of people living, working and thriving in the state of Borno. The pictures give a glimpse into the incredible ability for people to bounce back and over time begin to tell a new story.

Friday, 19 June 2020

Every Action Counts: Determinants of young people’s trajectories from education to employment in protracted displacement



By the Centre for Lebanese Studies and the Centre for Development and Emergency Practice

Saturday 20th June 2020 is World Refugee Day.  This year’s theme is “Every Action Counts”, highlighting refugees’ contributions to their societies, and the importance of creating a more just, equal, and inclusive world in which no one is left behind. The Centre for Lebanese Studies (CLS) and the Centre for Development and Emergency Practice’s (CENDEP) research programme “From Education to Employment” - funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) - works with young people living in protracted displacement in Lebanon and Jordan, seeking to understand their trajectories from education to employment.

Education is seen as a crucial aspect in young people’s lives, affecting and reflecting their chances in life, their aspirations and dreams, their security, and their place in society. Insights into the impact of financial crises on youth transitions from education and into employment have advanced our thinking on the increasing uncertainty and precarity facing young people – an uncertainty that is now inherent in the ‘new normal’ following the COVID19 pandemic. However, there are still gaps in our knowledge when it comes to different groups of young people. Refugees are often not seen as a relevant group in research on school to work trajectories in the Middle East, and the Global South, more generally.  

One of the main questions that we are grappling with in our work is how young people’s different social positions – their legal status, their gender, and their family background – and the inclusions and exclusions associated with these positions influence their trajectories from education to employment. In this blog we reflect on the results from our survey on the meaning of these social positions for young people’s education outcome, employment outcome and employability. The survey collected information from 1442 young persons (aged 15 to 29 years old) with different nationalities (Syrian, Palestinian, Jordanian, and Lebanese), legal statuses and socio-economic backgrounds, in both Lebanon and Jordan.[i]


Legal status
In the survey we use two broad categories of legal status: being a citizen of the country where you live or being a refugee. One of the key findings of our research is that legal status is a significant determinant of young people dropping out of school.[ii] While nationals are less likely to drop out of school than refugees in both countries, the effect was much greater in Lebanon. Legal status also strongly effects educational outcomes in Lebanon where nationals are almost 20% more likely to reach higher levels of schooling, as compared to refugees. However, the same effect was not found in Jordan. In both countries, nationals are more likely to have a higher net monthly earnings than refugees, to be in a job relevant to their education, and to be satisfied with their job.


Gender
Gender is a determinant of educational outcomes in Lebanon where males are more likely to drop out than females. However, we do not find the same differences in Jordan. In contrast, males in both Lebanon and Jordan are more likely to be employed as compared to females: These findings demonstrate the weak link between education and employability. Our results from both countries indicate that completing post-secondary or vocational training has no significant effect on the probability of being employed compared to those who only completed primary level or received no education. In Lebanon, completing secondary education may even reduce the probability of being employed, as compared to individuals who completed primary level/no education. Results from Jordan reveal that secondary education is not a significant determinant of employability.


Family Background and place
Family background and place of residence are significant factors in understanding young people’s education and employment. Three key findings stand out in our research:

Firstly, that parents’ education has an important role in determining the likelihood of dropping out and educational outcomes. Mothers’ education seems to be of greater importance compared to father’s education over all educational levels in both countries. For instance, having a mother with post-secondary education reduces an individual's dropout probability significantly compared to having a mother with primary education/no education. Similarly, our results indicate that the higher the mother’s educational attainment (secondary/post-secondary) is, the more likely it is that a young person will have better educational outcome. 

Secondly, place is a determinant of employability and employment outcomes with individuals residing in urban areas being more likely to be employed in Lebanon and Jordan. A young person living in an urban area such as Beirut is more likely to be employed compared to a young person residing in a semi-urban area such as the Bekaa.

Finally, in Lebanon, single young people are more likely to be employed compared to married/divorced young people, but the same effect on employability is not found in Jordan.


Towards a more inclusive understanding of young people in protracted refugee situations
The results presented show that legal status is an important determinant of education and employment outcomes, and that refugees continue to have lower outcomes than peers who are nationals of their host state. While this has important ramification for refugee education, and employment policy in both countries, it is important to recognise that legal status is not the sole determinant of education and employment outcomes for young people living in Lebanon and Jordan. Gender, parental education background, and place of residence all have significant effects on young people’s trajectories. The results also show important differences between young people’s outcomes in Lebanon and Jordan.

These results highlight the importance of taking an intersectional approach to understanding young people’s trajectories from education to employment and to understanding how their different statuses shape their trajectories within their national and local context. In order to work towards a more just, equal and inclusive world where no one is left behind, the lived realities of young people across social positions must be reflected. As we continue our research, we will be paying attention to how young people understand, explain, and navigate these influences on their trajectories from education to employment.

The full report will be published on CLS and CENDEP website next month.




[i] The overall study adopts a mixed-method approach. It combines a face-to-face survey of youth schooling and employment experiences with in-depth narrative interviews with young people (aged 15-29 years old) and their families. The face-to-face quantitative survey collected information pertaining to the young person’s legal status, socio-economic profile, household living conditions, education and employment. It was conducted between August 2019 and October 2019. The selection of the sample was representative of the different legal statuses of the overall population in the areas where we worked, according to available statistics. The study covered three areas in Lebanon, Beirut, the South and Bekaa and nine districts in the governorate of Amman, Jordan. Hence, when referring to Jordan here, all cases are in the governorate of Amman.
[ii] Dropout: include any person who did not obtain an educational certificate that qualifies him/her to compete for a non-labour intensive job market.

Monday, 15 June 2020

A right to consume? Resilience and climate change as human rights issues

Displaced family from South Sudan unable to reclaim their plot: the right to property can "unlock poverty traps" (UN photo)

EL Laskar writes: This year we had an opportunity to share reflections from CENDEP alumni. The voices of our alumni are important to us, they were the founders of the Oxford Human Rights Festival and their voices are part of the ongoing legacy of the festival. Our alumni make a rich tapestry across the globe and we welcome the voices, experience and expertise. Josh Ayers (CENDEP 2014) shared his reflections and highlighted some of the gaps of Article 17 of the Declaration of Human Rights - ‘Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others and no one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.’


The landmark 
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) signed in Paris in 1948 began the work of codifying human dignity into a minimum set of rights that the majority of the world’s nations at the time could agree upon.  For decades, much of civil society has affirmed these by taking  “rights-based approaches” to works of justice and compassion, sustainable development and the alleviation of human suffering.  Faith-based actors have readily taken up this cause as well.  Our work at Food for the Hungry shares many of the hallmarks of a “rights-based approach," including a dogged commitment to the foundation of human rights - the dignity of the human person.  Based on this bedrock of human dignity, the preponderance of rights listed in the UDHR address issues of fairness, freedom, and equality, painting a picture of the ideal society that most today can agree on.  

So what does this mean for those of us engaged with issues of resilience and climate change?  Expressed as “rights” -  or moral or legal entitlements to possess something or act in a certain way - our rights-based approaches have a tendency to become individualistic, singularly and reflexively focused on the “I” and “you”.  I have a right to life, liberty, and the security of the human person (myself).[1]  I have a right to own property, therefore you cannot take it from me arbitrarily.[2]  De Soto’s influential work in The Mystery of Capital made the explicit link between ownership of property (and the legal recognition of that ownership) and the functioning of the capitalist economy.  It is the legal entitlement, or right, to own property that allows the owner of that property to do with it as he or she pleases.  It is indeed Article 17 of the UDHR – the right to own property – that unlocks poverty traps for many of today’s most vulnerable people.  

Wednesday, 3 June 2020

Celebrating ‘Positive Encounters’ - Oxford City of Sanctuary Refugee Week

Elizabeth Laskar writes: 
The UK will be marking Refugee Week from 15 - 22 June. Instigated in 1988 in support of World Refugee Day (which is marked on the 20 June) the aim of the week is to support ‘positive encounters’ between communities by providing opportunities to learn about the refugee experience through talks, workshops, film and the creative arts.

This year the Oxford Human Rights Festival has collaborated with Oxford City of Sanctuary to co-host two events to support CENDEP MA candidate Basma El Doukhi in her initiatives to share her story and host a panel discussion on refugees, hope, solidarity and resilience during COVID-19. You can link on the titles below to register for the events.

Refugee Week OxHRF events
16 June 5.30pm - 7pm (UK) / Online
The Personal Journey of a Young Female Stateless Refugee Basma El Doukhi

19 June 5.00pm - 7pm / Online
Panel Discussion: Narratives of Hope, Solidarity and Resilience