Look at this picture. Does it depict torture? Of course, it
does. It is a representation of water torture in early modern Europe.
This is the same in all essentials as so-called waterboarding,* one of the “enhanced interrogation techniques” used
by the Central Intelligence Agency under the George W Bush administration and
extensively documented by a subsequent Senate investigation. Waterboarding is torture.
This is not the blog post I originally intended to write
today. (That one is on a much happier theme and I will post it tomorrow.) It is
not directly about our work at CENDEP, but since Lisa Handley and I spent four
years researching how to prevent torture, we could hardly not react to a major
piece of news this week. One of our findings was that investigation and prosecution
of torturers was a highly effective way of preventing torture. (We can
reasonably infer the converse – that failure to investigate and prosecute will
make the recurrence of torture more likely.)
Now consider this:
One
declassified cable, among scores obtained by the American Civil Liberties
Union in a lawsuit against the architects of the “enhanced interrogation”
techniques, says that chief of base and another senior counterterrorism
official on scene had the sole authority power to halt the questioning.
She never did so, records show,
watching as Zubaydah vomited, passed out and urinated on himself while
shackled. During one waterboarding session, Zubaydah lost consciousness and
bubbles began gurgling from his mouth. Medical personnel on the scene had to
revive him.
(You can read the whole story here.)
The chief of base mentioned in this account was Gina Haspel,
nominated this week by President Donald Trump to be the next director of the
CIA. Some of her defenders purport to be shocked that “liberals” and feminists are
not more excited that she is the first woman nominated to the post. Even
without attending CENDEP’s workshop on intersectionality this week, we know that
a woman who intersects with being a torturer is still a torturer.
Gina Haspel is by all accounts a criminal who has violated
one of the strongest prohibitions of international law. She is a torturer (who compounded
her crime by destroying evidence). She should be behind bars, not preparing for Senate confirmation hearings.
* So-called because waterboarding makes it sound like a fun
holiday activity. The use of a board is not an essential part of the torture;
near-drowning is.
See also this article by a CIA whistleblower who was imprisoned for exposing torture, while Haspel was being rewarded for it: https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/i-went-to-prison-for-disclosing-the-cias-torture-gina-haspel-helped-cover-it-up/2018/03/15/9507884e-27f8-11e8-874b-d517e912f125_story.html?utm_term=.d43fadadcfd1
ReplyDeleteIf you click the link above to ProPublica, you will see that they have now retracted part of their story. It was not Haspel who was chief of base at the time of Abu Zubaydah's torture. She did, however, oversee the waterboarding of another prisoner, Abd al-Rahim al-Nasiri. She was also responsible for destroying videotapes of torture, as stated in the blog post above.
ReplyDelete