Charles Parrack addressed a side event 68th Meeting of the Standing Committee, 15 March 2017 The Title of the session was Nobody Left Outside: Shelter as a Catalyst for Recovery, Development,
and Protection.
First: Shelter is linked to protection
Protection can be strengthened or weakened by decisions
made about physical characteristics of an intervention. Locations for shelter
are considered in terms of the threat of physical attacks, threats to safety or
environmentally unsuitable areas.
In addition it is essential to understand
statutory, legislative and customary access rights to land, water and other
natural resources as well as inheritance rights. This will reduce the risk of
conflict erupting due to issues of shelter location.
The link to conflict is made and that is my second point.
A
crucial element of the relationship between conflict and shelter is the
contestation of space related to land ownership and access to land resources -
often root causes of the conflict. Interventions related to access and use of
land will be embedded in the conflict, highly politicised and putting
humanitarian principles at stake. ‘Domicide’ - the planned and deliberate
destruction of homes is an instrument of war, causing displacement in an
attempt to control populations and affecting the ways in which sheltering may
take place during conflict. Similarly, destruction of cities or land, evidence the
political nature of shelter in conflict.
In conflict, the traditional division
between relief, recovery and development does not work. Indeed the humanitarian-
and emergency phase may last a long time with lapses and relapses of violence
and insecurity forcing populations to keep moving or stressing the need for
protection over material deliveries. After a ceasefire or a peace agreement,
reconstruction only works if it is linked to stabilisation and recovery.
Whatever shelter strategies are
implemented, there will be a significant impacts on conflict, either by
fuelling conflict or to be a driver for conflict transformation by creating
dialogue in daily practices. Research on urban violence shows that
interventions on space and rehabilitation of public spaces in particular, when
conceived as an integral urban project aiming for social change and
development, becomes the main driver for reducing urban violence.
Which brings me to my third point
Shelter is linked to cities.
The majority of the world’s population now
live now in cities, a movement which increases, and as noted by Habitat 3,
urbanisation will be one of the 21st century’s most transformative
trends. Cities will continue to be a location of conflict, and a key
destination in displacement. Shelter strategies are evolving to deal with this
complex and multi-layered environment.
We need different ways of thinking about
how to work in cities, and one productive approach is Systems thinking which focuses on
the interconnections and interrelationships between different parts of a
system, not just the elements themselves. It recognises
uncertainty and complexity and works with change and resilience.
There are many developmental linkages
through working in cities. Habitiat 3 and its rights based approach links the
humanitarian and development agendas, as well as sustainable development goal
11 sustainable cities and communities.
To conclude: What does this mean in practice?
I am an academic, and I work alongside
operational agencies in the Global Shelter Cluster to develop shelter policy.
A humanitarian programme has unrivalled
access to information in a crisis. There is a significant opportunity to gather
and analyse this information in order to contribute to evidence based policy
and advocacy, which is too often not taken. This is understandable, of course,
due to the ongoing pressure of operating in a crisis, but research capacity needs
to be strengthened in these challenging contexts.
A final word about people, the people who
we will need to involve in these challenges. My centre is located in a school
of Architecture. It is one of my goals to see global issues of migration and
displacement disseminated through architectural and built environment courses
in order to provide meaningful dialogue with the future expert practitioners in
complex environments.