Friday, 24 July 2020

OXHRF Refugee week events

(c) UNHCR


Basma El Doukhi (DEP 2019-20) reports on World Refugee Day and Refugee Week:


UNHCR’s annual Global Trends report for 2020 showed that forced displacement is now affecting more than one per cent of humanity – 1 in every 97 people – and with fewer and fewer of those who flee being able to return home. The report, which was published two days ahead of 20 June World Refugee Day, shows that an unprecedented 79.5 million were displaced as of the end of 2019.

 

“We are witnessing a changed reality in that forced displacement nowadays is not only vastly more widespread but is simply no longer a short-term and temporary phenomenon,” said UN High Commissioner for Refugees Filippo Grandi. “People cannot be expected to live in a state of upheaval for years on end, without a chance of going home, nor a hope of building a future where they are. We need a fundamentally new and more accepting attitude towards all who flee, coupled with a much more determined drive to unlock conflicts that go on for years and that are at the root of such immense suffering.”

Monday, 20 July 2020

Day of International Criminal Justice - watch now

Here is the complete video of the joint event by CENDEP, the Oxford Human Rights Festival and Oxford City of Sanctuary to mark the Day of International Criminal Justice on 17 July.


Wednesday, 15 July 2020

Whose voice counts? The fight for justice

Friday, 17 July is the Day of International Criminal Justice. It marks the anniversary of the adoption of the Rome Statute on 17 July 1998, the founding treaty of the International Criminal Court, which seeks to protect people from genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and the crime of aggression. 17 July unites all those who wish to support justice, promote victims' rights, and help prevent crimes that threaten the peace, security and well-being of the world.

To mark this day CENDEPOxford Human Rights Festival and Oxford City of Sanctuary have organised a panel discussion on the theme: Whose voice counts? The focus of the discussion will be the Rohingya people and their struggle for justice. 

Thursday, 9 July 2020

Reading Broken Cities: Inside the Global Housing Crisis

Anna Lindley writes:


In large cities all over the world, people talk about ‘the housing problem’ or the ‘housing crisis’ – but what exactly do they mean? And to what extent is it a global problem, or many different problems? Are we on the edge of a very different kind of urban future? These are the questions that Deborah Potts tackles in her tour-de-force book Broken Cities, published by Zed earlier this year. The neoliberal approach tends to frame the problem as one of market supply – that there is a shortage of housing or land to build on. If enough houses are built, the market logic goes, prices will fall and become affordable. But research suggests that while house-building may help those on the edges of the affordability line, they tend to have limited impact on the majority of those on low incomes, who fall well below. Drawing on decades of research and teaching focusing on urban centres in Southern Africa, the UK and elsewhere, Deborah Potts emphasizes the role of demand-side problems driving the affordability conundrum. While poorer people in these cities undoubtedly need housing, they do not have near enough income to secure what is understood as a ‘decent’, ‘legal’ home. While unemployment can make this worse, most people thus affected are in fact in work – the stark reality is that their employers just do not pay truly liveable wages. In many cities, incomes at the bottom end of the spectrum have long fallen short of the cost of social reproduction (particularly the rising cost of housing) and the minimum pay and pensions increases that would be required to rectify this are so big as to be unlikely without major political transformation. 


Broken Cities illuminates common responses of low-income city-dwellers to the affordability challenge. People may squeeze on space (e.g. crowding families or co-workers into one room, co-ordinating bed use around shift patterns); they may resort to more basic or improvised structures (e.g. trailers, subdivided housing units, office conversions, backyard shacks, squats); they may live in informal settlements on city peripheries (in cheap housing close enough to employment opportunities but with insecure tenure and poor conditions); they may fall into an itinerant, ‘hidden homeless’ existence (sofa-surfing or spending prolonged periods in ‘temporary’ accommodation). These are pragmatic, bottom-up, informal ‘solutions’ that avoid street homelessness but are a very long way from what most people think of as an appropriate home – and indeed may be endangering to health and contravene local housing standards. A particular strength of the book is its global and historical reach, connecting urban housing problems across the world, probing contextual detail, differences and distinctiveness, but always with a close eye on common features and the core conundrum of affordability of decent housing for the poorest in society.

Thursday, 2 July 2020

Police reform: lessons from CENDEP research

Photo credit: Wikipedia
Richard Carver writes:

George Floyd was tortured to death. This is not how his death is usually described, but it meets the clear definition of torture in international law: it was severe pain and suffering inflicted by a state agent for a deliberate purpose, in this instance racial animus or discrimination. CENDEP’s Lisa Handley and I directed a multi-country study to determine which were the most effective measures to deter torture, published as Does Torture Prevention Work? (Liverpool University Press 2016). Some of our findings have a direct relevance to the problem of police violence against African-Americans.

The most important measures to prevent torture are safeguards in the hours and days after arrest, including detention being recorded, notification of a family member or friend, and prompt access to a lawyer and medical examination. George Floyd was in police custody – defined as being unable to leave freely – and was informed that he was under arrest. The justification for the use of force was that Floyd was resisting arrest, although the videos taken by bystanders show that this was not so.