In this talk, we
aim to unpack and analyse the potentials and shortcomings of a humanitarian
framework for educational responses in protracted displacement. Most literature
on this topic tends to examine humanitarianism and education separately and few
studies have analysed the effect of the humanitarian model on the education
provisions and policies and most importantly on the outcomes. Humanitarianism
is concerned with the immediate while education is a future oriented-activity.
Hence the interrelation between the two might appear an oxymoron. At the same
time, calls to shift the humanitarian discourse from relief and survival to
development have given strong grounds to include education as part of the
humanitarian response in a situation of crisis. Yet there is a lack of clarity
concerning the concept of development which the education provisions rest on. In
the talk we will unpack the concept of education in emergency and its effect on
students’ schooling outcomes. The study focuses on Lebanon as a case to analyse
the potentials and limitations of this model. To do so, the study analyses the
educational policies and interventions Lebanon introduced in the last seven
years since the outbreak of the Syrian crisis and examine their impact on the
education outcomes of Syrian children. In conclusion, we reflect on some of the
potential outcomes of the current model and introduces some alternatives to the
current education system for refugees.
Maha Shuayb is the director of the Centre for Lebanese Studies (CLS). Maha has a PhD in education from the University of Cambridge. She also teaches part-time at the Lebanese American University. She is currently a visiting fellow at the University of Cambridge. Maha’s research focuses on the sociology and politics of education particularly equity and equality in education and the implications of the politicization of education particularly on marginalized groups. Over the past eight years, Maha has been occupied with the education response to the Syrian Refugee crisis in Lebanon. She has headed a number of research studies looking at access and quality of education for refugees and the bottlenecks. A recent studies include a comparative longitudinal study between Lebanon, Turkey, Germany and Australia which examines the impact of status on education provisions for refugees in the four countries.
Professor Cathrine
Brun is a human geographer and Director of the Centre for Development and
Emergency Practice (CENDEP), the School of Architecture at Oxford Brookes
University, UK. Her research-interests concern forced migration and conflict, housing
and home; theory, ethics and practice of humanitarianism. Working closely with
local and national organisations in places like Georgia, Sri Lanka, Malawi and Lebanon, her approach to research
is qualitative, ethnographic and using action research as a way of co-producing
knowledge. Some recent publications
include “Living with shifting borders:
peripheralisation and the production of invisibility” (2017, Geopolitics); “Mobilising home
for long term displacement: a reflection on the durable solutions” (with Anita
H. Fábos, 2017, Journal of Human Rights
Practice,); “Homemaking in limbo? A conceptual framework” (with
Anita H. Fàbos, Refuge, 2015) and “There is no Future in Humanitarianism”
(History and Anthropology, 2015).
Maha, the CLS and Cathrine and CENDEP currently collaborate on an ESRC and IDRC funded research programme on From Education to Employment: young people’s trajectories in the context of protracted displacement in Lebanon and Jordan.
No comments:
Post a Comment